In any case, people with children from previous relationships who have a high net worth, who have already created trust funds or hold property in their name, individually or with another person who is not your future spouse, should in any case discuss the execution of a marriage contract with one of our family law lawyers, given that, in these specific circumstances, individuals tend to: substantially benefit from these contracts. Unfortunately, the negative connotation, often related to marriage contracts, prevents many couples from discussing the considerable legal benefits of pre-marital contracts. Many legal scholars believe that these contracts are important because they can address potential issues such as debt, financial planning, interfaith litigation, and property sharing in the event of death or divorce, making three main things. Couples can design parenting plans with proposed agreements on custody, visitation, child-raising and support when they separate, but parents should not include these conditions in a prenup. The court will not even take into account the conditions relating to the custody of the children in the context of a marriage contract and may, in certain circumstances, lead the court to invalidate the entire agreement. In California, a couple can waive their rights to share property (co-ownership) through a marriage contract.  The agreement may limit the condition of the spouses (although a court may annul it at the time of divorce if it considers that the restriction is ruthless). The agreement can be used as a contract to make a will obliging one spouse to take care of the other in the event of death. It can also restrict inheritance rights in the event of death, such as the right to estate compensation, the right to act on an executor, the right to take predetermined inheritance, etc.
 In California, registered national partners can also take out a prenup. Post-marital agreements are treated very differently in California law. Spouses have a fiduciary duty to each other, so pre-marital agreements fall under a special category of agreements. There is a presumption that the succession agreement was obtained through unlawful influence when a party obtains an advantage. It is not possible to waive disclosure as part of a conjugal agreement. [Citation required] In some countries, including the United States, Belgium and the Netherlands, the marriage contract provides not only for what happens in the event of divorce, but also for the protection of part of the property during the marriage, for example in the event of bankruptcy. Many countries, including Canada, France, Italy and Germany, have matrimonial regimes, in addition to or, in some cases, in place of marriage contracts. In the past, couples have entered into pre-marital agreements with a degree of uncertainty as to their validity. Today, the presumed validity and applicability of such agreements is no longer at issue in the states that have adopted the UPAA/UPMAA, including Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, and California.  In India, marriage contracts are very rare and have no laws in force. However, with rising divorce rates, people are becoming more and more interested in it. Some lawyers believe that prenups in India have no legal sanctity.
However, in some cases, some form of contract is signed, usually among affluent citizens. But agreements must be reasonable and not violate existing laws such as the Hindu Marriage Act. Indian courts allow the signing of a settlement protocol during divorces. But no court has yet been asked to impose a prenup.  In practice, spouses can violate canon law in various ways. For example, they cannot prepare for a marriage on terms that concern the future. According to the Code of Canon Law, “a marriage linked to a condition of the future cannot be concluded effectively”. (CIC 1102) While there are fewer formal requirements for marriage contracts established in the state of Alabama compared to other states, it`s best to sign the marriage contract in front of your own attorney and get your attorney a certificate of independent legal advice. . . .